Negotiable
The date of payment from buyers deliver within days
Beijing
Long-term effective
2017-11-10 19:25
225
Company Profile
Saiptech Co., Ltd.By certification [File Integrity]
Contact:Mr. Zhang(Mr.)
Email:
Telephone:
Phone:
Area:Beijing
Address:Beijing
Website: http://saiptech.byshaiwang.com/
Comparison of Common Conventional Tray | ||||
TRAY TYPE | BUBBLE CAP | DUALFLOW | SIEVE | VALVE |
Capacity | Moderate | Very High | High | High to very high |
Pressure Drop | High | Low to Moderate | Low to Moderate | Moderate.Older designs were somewhat higher.Recent designs same as sieve trays. |
Efficiency | Moderate (0.6 - 0.8) | Lower compared to others (0.5 - 0.7) | High (0.7 - 0.9) | High (0.7 - 0.9) |
Turndown | Very high Can handle very Can handle very low liquid rates | Low. Not suitable for suitable for varying loads | Approx. 2:1. Unsuitable for Unsuitable for varying loads operation | Approx. 3-5:1 Higher turndown Higher turndown designs can be provided on request. |
Maintenance | Relatively high | Low | Low | Low to moderate |
Fouling Tendency | High. Tends to accummulate solid particles | Extremely low. Best choice for Severe fouling | Low | Low to moderate |
Main Application | Very low flow conditions where leakage needs to be minimized | Capacity revamps where efficiensy and turndown not critical high fouling and corrosive servies | Most columns where trundown not important | Most Columns services where turndown important |
Cost | High -approx 2~3 times that for sieve trays | Low | Low | Marginally higher than sieve trays |